|
Official Title: Drugs. Probation and Treatment Program.
Initiative Statute.
Results
Official
statewide election results are available from the Secretary
of State's web site.
Official Summary: Requires probation and drug treatment,
not incarceration, for possession, use, transportation of controlled substances and
similar parole violations, except sale or manufacture. Authorizes dismissal of charges
after completion of treatment. Fiscal Impact: Net annual savings of $100 million
to $150 million to the state and about $40 million to local governments. Potential
avoidance of one-time capital outlay costs to the state of $450 million to $550 million. |
Web Sites
Contact Information
YES
|
|
Dave Fratello or Whitney Taylor
Campaign for New Drug Policies
1250 6th Street #202
Santa Monica, CA 90401 |
|
|
(310) 394-2952 |
NO
|
|
Frank de Lima or Jean Munoz
Californians United Against Drug Abuse
455 Capitol Mall, Ste 801
Sacramento, CA 95814 |
|
|
(800) 995-3221 |
Follow the Money
Who Signed the Ballot Arguments
YES
|
|
NO
|
Peter Banys, President, California Society of Addiction
Medicine |
|
John T. Schwarzlose, President, Betty Ford Center |
Richard Polanco, Majority Leader, California State Senate |
|
Alan M. Crogan, President, Chief Probation Officers of
California |
Kay McVay, President, California Nurses Association |
|
Thomas J. Orloff, President, California District Attorneys
Association |
Maxine Waters, Member of U.S. Congress |
|
Richard M. Romley, Maricopa County District Attorney,
State of Arizona |
Tim Sinnott, President, California Association of Alcoholism
and Drug Abuse Counselors |
|
Robert Nalett, Vice President, California Sexual Assault
Investigators Association |
|
|
Stephen V. Manley, President, California Association of
Drug Court Professionals |
News Coverage
Prop. 36
incites drug use, Porterville counselor says, Fresno Bee, November
24, 2000 |
Money,
opinion, propelled Prop 36, San Francisco Chronicle, November
15, 2000 |
Prop
36 may give county, courts a tough challenge, SD Union Tribune,
November 13, 2000 |
Not
enough drug clinics in state for Prop 36, San Francisco Chronicle,
November 13, 2000 |
Prop. 36 to affect
prosecutions, Sacramento Bee, November 9, 2000 |
Voters
take a new tack in war on drugs, San Diego Union Tribune, November
9, 2000 |
Drug-offender
treatment measure wins, Sacramento Bee, November 8, 2000 |
Prop
36 polarizes treatment advocates, Contra Costa Times, November
6, 2000 |
Prop
36 foes say it curtails options that judges need..., SD Union
Tribune, October 31, 2000 |
Prop 36
could hurt drug court, Fresno Bee, October 23, 2000 |
Prop.
36's support is still falling, data show, San Diego Union Tribune,
October 14, 2000 |
Meddling
tycoons or visionary activists?, San Diego Union Tribune, October
9, 2000 |
Prop.
36 Backers seek to change federal policy, San Francisco Chronicle,
October 6, 2000 |
San
Mateo County Officials Blast Prop. 36, San Francisco Chronicle,
October 3, 2000 |
Advocates
boost profiles of 2 ballot measures, Fresno Bee, September 22,
2000 |
Don't talk,
Prop 36 backers tell Jones..., Sacramento Bee, September 21, 2000 |
Philanthropist
crusades against nation's drug war, Sacramento Bee, September
17, 2000 |
Most unaware
of Prop 36, but back idea, Sacramento Bee, August 30, 2000 |
California
has stake in Arizona plan, San Diego Union Tribune, August 7,
2000 |
Initiative
would shift focus..., San Diego Union Tribune, August 6, 2000 |
'Serious
money' will be spent on drug measure, San Diego Union Tribune,
June 12, 2000 |
Battle
over drug treatment initiative heats up, San Diego Union Tribune,
June 7, 2000 |
U.S.
drug czar says initiative would weaken courts' power, SD Union
Tribune, June 3, 2000 |
Drug
offense measure makes ballot, San Francisco Chronicle, June 1,
2000 |
Treat, don't
jail, illegal drug users?..., Sacramento Bee, May 31, 2000 |
Drug
reforms would keep users jail-free, San Francisco Examiner, May
28, 2000 |
Measure treats drug use as illness..., San Diego
Union Tribune, April 19, 2000 |
Move seeks to keep addicts out of jail, San Diego
Union Tribune, October 1, 1999 |
For More Information, CVF Recommends...
Next Proposition
|