News Releases

For Immediate Release, Thursday, February 19, 2004
Contact: Kim Alexander or Rachel Zenner
(916) 441-2494, (530) 750-7650, or info@calvoter.org

Voter Group Issues Warning on Electronic Voting Systems, Urges Use of Absentee Ballots in Certain Counties

Absentee Ballot Request Deadline is February 24

Davis, CA – The California Voter Foundation (CVF) is urging voters in counties where electronic, touchscreen voting systems are used to instead vote by paper absentee ballot in the March 2 election.

Citing security concerns, questionable oversight practices and an inability to conduct meaningful audits of election results on the paperless systems, CVF president Kim Alexander said voters in 14 California counties that use touchscreen voting systems should immediately request an absentee ballot from their county elections office. Applications for absentee ballots must be received by Tuesday, February 24.

“Our advice,” Alexander said, “is to cast your votes on paper.”

“Voters who do not want to entrust their ballots to risky, inauditable technology have a choice -- they can reject the paperless touchscreen system and instead vote absentee using a paper ballot. We are encouraging voters who live in electronic voting counties to exercise that choice this election,” Alexander said.

California counties using electronic voting systems on March 2 comprise 40 percent of the state’s electorate. They include Alameda, Kern, Merced, Napa, Orange, Plumas, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Joaquin, Santa Clara, Shasta, Solano, and Tehama.

Ballots cast on electronic voting machines do not allow voters to verify how their vote is recorded, as there is no paper record. Although Secretary of State Kevin Shelley has announced he will require a voter verified paper record of every digital ballot cast, this requirement will not take effect until July 2006. 

Election security concerns related to electronic touchscreen systems have been heightened due to a number of recent developments:

• The State of Maryland commissioned an independent study to test the security of Diebold’s voting system. The computer security firm they hired was easily able to hack into the system, record multiple votes and alter vote counts on the machines – both on site and remotely. The Maryland report is the third independent investigation of Diebold's software to discover serious problems. The Diebold system studied is the same one used by several California counties.

• After learning that some counties used an uncertified version of Diebold's software in the October 7, 2003 Recall election, the Secretary of State's office launched an investigation into all 17 counties using Diebold voting equipment. Although the investigation is still pending, preliminary results show that all counties using Diebold voting equipment were using uncertified versions of Diebold software during the October and November elections.

• In response to growing concerns about electronic voting security, California Secretary of State Kevin Shelley issued a directive to all electronic voting counties outlining additional security steps, including parallel monitoring and posting of official results outside polling places at the close of polls. However, ten county registrars are refusing to cooperate with this directive, insisting that existing security and oversight is adequate.

• Four counties -- Kern, San Joaquin, Solano and San Diego -- will use Diebold's new TSx machine for the Primary, despite the machine's lack of federal approval. There is no guarantee the machines will be federally approved by March 2.

Voters can mail in their absentee ballots prior to the election or return them to their polling place on Election Day. “Absentee voters who return ballots to their polling places can experience the excitement of Election Day, get their 'I voted' sticker and cast their votes with confidence that their ballot is backed up on paper,” Alexander said.

The nonprofit, nonpartisan group is also encouraging voters to participate in election monitoring activities at the precinct and countywide level, such as:

• Volunteering to serve on local “Election Observer” and “Logic and Accuracy” oversight committees;

• Witnessing pre-election “Logic and Accuracy” testing and the post-election “manual count” verification process;

• Monitoring polling places, poll closings, and Election Night vote counts at the county election office.

Any irregularities should be reported to the Secretary of State's toll-free “Voter Protection Hotline”, 1-800-345-VOTE.

More information about the March 2, California Primary, California voting systems, and voting technology reform is available from the California Voter Foundation's web site, http://www.calvoter.org. CVF is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization advancing the repsonsible use of technology to improve democracy.

- end -

Request an Absentee Ballot

Site Map | Privacy Policy | About Calvoter.org

This page was first published on February 19, 2004 | Last updated on January 27, 2006
Copyright California Voter Foundation, All Rights Reserved.