California Online Voter Guide
June 2010 Statewide Primary Election
19th edition
Proposition 16 - New Two-Thirds Vote Requirement for Local Public Electricity Providers. Failed
Initiative Constitutional Amendment
- Official Summary
- What a Yes or No Vote Means
- Official Voter Guide page
- Campaign Web Sites and Contact Information
- Who Signed the Ballot Arguments
- News Stories
- Top 5 Donors
-
Requires local governments to obtain the approval of two-thirds of the voters before providing electricity service to new customers or expanding such service to new territories using public funds or bonds.
-
Requires same two-thirds vote to provide electricity service through a community choice program using public funds or bonds.
-
Requires the vote to be in the jurisdiction of the local government and any new territory to be served.
-
Provides exceptions to the voting requirements for a limited number of identified projects.
A YES vote on this measure means: Local governments would generally be required to receive two-thirds voter approval before they could start up electricity services or expand electricity service into a new territory.
A NO vote on this measure means: Local governments generally could continue to implement proposals involving the start-up or expansion of electricity service either through approval by a majority of voters or actions by governing boards.
This page features the Legislative Analyst's analysis, pro-con arguments, legislative votes and the full proposition text.
Campaign Web Sites and Contact Information
- Yes on Proposition 16
YES On 16/Californians to Protect Our Right to Vote
2350 Kerner Blvd., Suite 250, San Rafael, CA 94901
Email: info@taxpayersrighttovote.com
Web site: www.taxpayersrighttovote.com - No on Proposition 16
Taxpayers Against the PG&E Powergrab,
Sponsored by Local Power, Inc. and The Utility Reform Network
Mindy Spatt
5429 Madison Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95841
(415) 929-8876 x306
Web site: www.powergrab.info
Who Signed the Ballot Arguments
- Yes on Proposition 16
Teresa Casazza, President, California Taxpayers’ Association
Allan Zaremberg, President, California Chamber of Commerce - No on Proposition 16
Jeannine English, California State President, AARP
Andy Katz, Chair, Sierra Club California
Richard Holober, Executive Director, Consumer Federation of California
News Stories
This page provides excerpts from and links to news coverage of the propositions on the ballot.
Follow the Money
Proposition 16 - Top Five Donors (as of 6/2/10) |
|||||
Position |
S U P P O R T |
|
O P P O S E |
||
Total Raised * (as of 6/2) |
$46,206,258 |
|
$97,937 |
||
Top Donors (as of 6/2) |
Donor information |
Amount |
|
Donor Information |
Amount |
Pacific
Gas and Electric Company |
$46,115,000 |
The Utility Reform Network, San Francisco, CA |
$33,022 |
||
California Business PAC, sponsored by the California Chamber of Commerce (AKA CALBUSPAC), Sacramento, CA |
$141,258 |
|
California Association of Realtors Issues Mobilization PAC, Los Angeles, CA |
$25,000 |
|
|
|
|
Sierra Club Marin Regional Group, San Francisco, CA |
$5,500 |
|
|
|
|
Alliance for Retail Energy Markets, Grover Beach, CA |
$5,000 |
|
|
|
Rubio for Senate 2010, Bakersfield, CA | $3,900 |
* Total amount raised includes all contributions received in 2009 and through May 22, 2010, plus contributions of $5,000 or more received between May 23 - June 2, 2010.
Detailed information about all contributors for and against Proposition 16 is available from campaign finance reports at Cal-Access, the Secretary of State's campaign disclosure web site.
To view the most recent contributions, select a committee and click "Late and $5000+ Contributions Received".
This page was first published on April
25, 2010 |
Last updated on
July 31, 2010
Copyright California Voter Foundation, All Rights Reserved.