California Online Voter Guide
November 2008 General Election
17th edition
Proposition 10 - Alternative Fuel Vehicles and Renewable Energy. Bonds. Failed
Initiative Statute
Summary
-
Provides $3.425 billion to help consumers and others purchase certain high fuel economy or alternative fuel vehicles, including natural gas vehicles, and to fund research into alternative fuel technology.
-
Provides $1.25 billion for research, development and production of renewable energy technology, primarily solar energy with additional funding for other forms of renewable energy; incentives for purchasing solar and renewable energy technology.
-
Provides grants to cities for renewable energy projects and to colleges for training in renewable and energy efficiency technologies.
-
Total funding provided is $5 billion from general obligation bonds.
-
Fiscal Impact: State costs of about $10 billion over 30 years to pay off both the principal ($5 billion) and interest ($5 billion) costs of the bonds. Payments of about $335 million per year.
-
Fiscal Impact: Increase in state sales tax revenues of an unknown amount, potentially totaling in the tens of millions of dollars, over the period from 2009 to about 2019.
-
Fiscal Impact: Increase in local sales tax and vehicle license fee revenues of an unknown amount, potentially totaling in the tens of millions of dollars, over the period from 2009 to about 2019.
-
Fiscal Impact: Potential state costs of up to about $10 million annually, through about 2019, for state agency administrative costs not funded by the measure.
What a Yes or No Vote Means
YES: A “YES” vote on this measure means: The state could sell $5 billion in general obligation bonds for various renewable energy, alternative fuel, energy efficiency, and air emissions reduction purposes.
NO: A “NO” vote on this measure means: The state would not sell $5 billion in general obligation bonds for these purposes.
Full Text of Proposition 10 - (PDF)
Official Campaign Web Sites and Contact Information
-
Yes on Proposition 10
Yes on Prop 10
Californians for Energy Independence – Yes on Prop. 10
1415 L Street, Suite 430
Sacramento, CA 95814
Email: info@prop10yes.com
Web site: www.prop10yes.com - No on Proposition 10
No on Prop 10
Consumer Federation of California
520 S. El Camino Real, Suite 340
San Mateo, CA 94402
Phone: (650) 375-7840
Email: info@votenoonprop10.com
Web site: www.votenoonprop10.com
Who Signed the Ballot Arguments
-
Yes on Proposition 10
Dr. Alan Henderson, Past President, American Cancer Society, California Division
Miguel Pulido, Governing Board Member, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Allison Hart, Executive Director, Clean and Renewable Energy Association
- No on Proposition 10
Lenny Goldberg, Executive Director, California Tax Reform Association
Mark Toney, Executive Director, The Utility Reform Network (TURN)
Marty Hittleman, President, California Federation of Teachers
News Articles
CVF's News Stories section provides California voters with convenient access to a sampling of news articles that give an overview of the potential impact of the propositions on the ballot.
Follow the Money
Proposition 10 |
|||||
Position |
Support |
|
Oppose |
||
Total Raised |
$17,499,850 |
|
$76,613 |
||
Top Donors |
Name |
Amount |
|
Name |
Amount |
Clean Energy Fuels Corp. |
$15,747,250 |
|
|
$50,000 |
|
Chesapeake Energy |
$1,000,000 |
|
Consumer Federation
of California |
$16,613 |
|
Aubrey McClendon, CEO, |
$500,000 |
|
California
Federation of Teachers COPE Prop/Ballot |
$10,000 |
|
Westport Fuel Systems,
Inc. |
$250,000 |
|
|||
Dodge Insurance Services,
Inc. |
$2,500 |
|
Detailed information about all contributors for and against Proposition 10 is available from campaign finance reports at Cal-Access, the Secretary of State's campaign disclosure web site. To view the most recent contributions, select a committee and click "Late and $5000+ Contributions Received".
This page was first published on September
27, 2008 |
Last updated on
April 28, 2009
Copyright California Voter Foundation, All Rights Reserved.