INITIATIVE WATCH

A project of the California Voter Foundation

first published 8/18/99
| last updated 1/24/01

The following measures failed to qualify for the ballot



(tip: to search the words on this page, use the "find" command (command-f) in your browser.)
Regulation of Alcoholic Beverage Sales (859) California Tobacco Litigation Settlement Funds (886)
Legalized Gambling (860) Prohibition on Unsolicited Telemarketing Calls (887)
Lawful Marriage in California (861) Legislators' and State Officers' Compensation (888)
Cal-Vet Loan Program Audit (862) Reapportionment (889)
Elections. Reapportionment (863) Referendum Process (890)
Drug Treatment Diversion Program (864) Santa Barbara County Court Case Files (891)
Civil Rights. Taxes for Higher Education (867) Election District Reapportionment (892)
Education. Public School Funding Increase (868) Political Contribution Limits (893)
Expansion of Constitutional Definition of a Person (869) Election Districts. Redistricting Commission (894)
Use of Internet for Voter Registration and Voting (870) Redistricting Commission Election Districts (895)
Restricting Application of Three Strikes Law (872) Voucher System (896)
Identity Verification (873) September Primary and Campaign Finance Reform (897)
Identity Theft (875) June Primary and Campaign Finance Reform (898)
Prayer in Public Schools (882) Repeal of Proposition 209 (899)
Public Schools. Class Size Reduction (883) Legislative Term Limits (900)
Legalized Gambling (884) Restrictions on Judicial Immunity (902)
Tobacco Litigation Settlement Funds (885) Local Property Tax. Revenue Allocation (903)



Regulation of Alcoholic Beverage Sales. Extension of Permissible Hours for Sales and Purchases.
Initiative Statute, ID #859

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Joseph M. Kar
(310) 276-1909

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 4/17/00)

Official Summary: Amends Business and Professions Code section 25631 to allow sales and purchases of alcoholic beverages for an additional two hours each day. Extends the hours that on-sale liquor licensees and off-sale liquor licensees may sell alcoholic beverages and consumers may purchase alcoholic beverages from 2:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m. Provides misdemeanor penalty for on-sale or off-sale sales or purchases of alcoholic beverages between 4:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: This measure could result in increased state and local regulatory and enforcement costs totaling several million dollars annually.




Legalized Gambling.
Initiative Statute, ID #860

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Robert W. Wilson c/o John Brown
(805) 983-2238

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 4/21/00)

Official Summary: Legalizes Las Vegas and Atlantic City type gambling for period of 28 years at two locations only, California City in Kern County and an Indian reservation to be selected by majority vote of all California tribes recognized by the federal government. Permits gambling presently prohibited including slot machines and various other banked games. Creates three-member state commission to supervise gaming activities, including the issuance of permits. Upon expiration of 28 years, Legislature may: further extend experimental program; extend legalized gambling to all counties and Indian tribes; or eliminate gambling in its entirety. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This measure could result in annual revenues to the state and local governments potentially in the tens of millions of dollars from fees and taxes associated with Las Vegas- and Atlantic City-type operations and other related economic activity.




Lawful Marriage in California.
Initiative Statute, ID #861

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Thomas Henning and John Henning
(323) 655-6100

available from proponent's web site

FOR

www.samesexmarriage.org

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 4/21/00)

Official Summary: Amends constitution to state that two people of the same sex may lawfully marry in California. Provides that such a marriage would be subject to provisions of California law applicable to other marriages. Amendment does not require any church, religion or religious organization to perform any marriage ceremony. Supersedes any California law that prohibits legal marriage between two people of the same sex who meet the legal requirements applicable to other married persons. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This measure would result in unknown additional costs and unknown net increase or decrease in revenues.




Cal-Vet Loan Program Audit.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute, ID #862

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

John L. Debbs
(916) 424-9139

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 4/28/00)

Official Summary: Amends statutes and Constitution to require certified audit of Cal-Vet Loan Program by February 1, 2001, and every three years thereafter. Subjects state employees and others to criminal prosecution and, upon conviction, to forfeiture of employment, public office, and retirement benefits if, since 1982 or 1975, they knew or should have known of asserted wrongful use of Cal-Vet Program money. Requires commencement of criminal prosecutions and of civil actions to correct errors discovered in an audit and to recover money that is found to have been wrongly diverted. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments. Measure would have an unknown but potentially significant fiscal effect on state government by providing, based primarily upon the results of an audit, for the transfer of about $230 million to a reserve fund and by potentially resulting in tens of millions of dollars in additional costs. Some of these state costs would be one-time in nature and others would be ongoing.




Elections. Reapportionment.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment, ID #863

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

William Westmiller (805) 493-4332

available from proponent's web site

FOR

www.fairvote2k.org

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 05/25/00)

see note

Official Summary: Provides that districts for election of Congress, State Senate and Assembly, and Board of Equalization shall be drawn by the Secretary of State based solely upon geographical compactness and population determined by census divisions designated by the federal Census Bureau. Provides that the population of each district for Congress, each district for State Senate and Assembly, and each district for Board of Equalization shall not vary more than 1% from the average population of all districts of that type. Districts shall be drawn without regard to party registration, voting history, race, sex, or national origin. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This measure would result in costs to the State, probably up to several hundred thousand dollars once each decade, for the Secretary of State to establish the boundaries. This initiative would also result in unknown, but probably minor, savings to county governments by repealing the mandate that they compile and submit specified electoral data to the Legisature once each decade.

Note: Proponent's web site states they plan to circulate a similar initiative for the 2002 ballot.




Drug Treatment Diversion Program.
Initiative Statute, ID #864

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Cliff Gardner

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 5/8/00)

see note

Official Summary: Requires drug treatment program and probation for certain non-violent drug possession offenses and similar parole violations not including sale, production or manufacture. Permits court to impose additional conditions of probation but not incarceration. Specifies procedures for determining probation or parole violation and consequences. Authorizes dismissal of charges upon successful completion of treatment but requires disclosure of arrest and conviction to law enforcement and as necessary for candidates, peace officers, licensure, contracting with State Lottery, jury service. Requires studies of measure's effectiveness. Appropriates state funds and uses forfeited assets for drug treatment program. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This measure is likely to result in net savings to the state that probably range between $100 million and $150 million annually for lower costs for prison operations with a one-time avoidance of capital outlay costs of between $475 million and $575 million for prison construction. Counties would probably experience net savings of about $50 million annually due primarily to a lower jail population. This measure would also likely result in the transfer to a state trust fund, and the subsequent reallocation to counties, of as much as $71 million annually in asset forfeiture proceeds. About $10 million in asset forfeiture proceeds could be transferred from the state and as much as $61 million could be diverted from counties, cities, special districts, and school districts.

Note: Proponent did qualify a different version of the Drug Treatment Diversion Program measure for the November 2000 ballot -- see CVF's November 2000 ballot measure page for details about that measure.

News Articles:
Measure treats drug use as illness. . ., in the San Diego Union Tribune, April 19, 2000
Move seeks to keep addicts out of jail . . ., in the San Diego Union Tribune, October 1, 1999


Civil Rights. Taxes for Higher Education
Initiative Constitutional Amendment, ID #867

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Mervin Evans

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 5/8/00)

Official Summary: Revises California Constitution to restore affirmative action programs and preferences for historical victims of racism or sexism in the operation of public education and public contracting. Creates a 1.5% tax on retail sales to establish "The Student Higher Education Trust Fund." Half of the Fund will be used to pay for all admission and student related fees for all California residents at California public colleges. The other half of the Fund will go to the California Superintendent of Public Instruction to create college-bound programs for poor children. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: If passed, there would be an annual increase in retail sales taxes of about 6 billion dollars to be used for higher education and social services programs. The measure would result in significant increases in state capital costs for constructing public higher education facilities as well as increases in state and local costs of potentially tens of millions of dollars per year to implement preferential contracting programs.



Education. Public School Funding Increase to At Least National Average. Additional College, University Funding. Taxes.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment, ID #868

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Wayne Johnson, Barbara E. Kerr and David A. Sanchez
c/o Robin B. Johansen and Joseph Remcho
(415) 398-6230

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 05/19/00)

see note

Official Summary: Increases funding for public schools to at least the national average for per pupil expenditures, phased in over five years, adjusted for inflation. New funds to be used for specified uses including class size reduction, core curriculum standards, textbooks, teacher salary and training, fiscal accountability. Provides $600 million annual additional funding for state universities and colleges, phased in over five years, adjusted for inflation and enrollment. Requires Legislature to pass necessary taxes by majority vote. Prohibits additional property taxes for this purpose. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This measure would result in tax increases reaching between approximately $4 billion and $4.8 billion annually by 2005-06. Of this approximate amount, between $3.3 billion and $4.1 billion would go to the public schools, with the remainder going to the state's public college and university systems.

Note: Proponent told CVF in May that they are no longer pursuing qualification of this measure. (See San Francisco Chronicle article below.)

News Articles:
Governor Cuts Deal for School Spending . . ., San Francisco Chronicle, May 11, 2000
State reaches `crossroads' on funding for schools, San Diego Union Tribune, May 8, 2000
Three initiatives likely to qualify for the November ballot . . ., Contra Costa Times, May 3, 2000
Initiative to increase school funding gains, Sacramento Bee, February 29, 2000




Expansion of Constitutional Definition of a Person.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment, ID #869

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

John E. Seepe III
(909) 678-2145

and Chris Rosebrough
(909) 674-1514

available from proponent's web site

FOR

www.rightbot.com/life

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 05/25/00)

Official Summary: Amends the State Constitution to provide that the definition of a person includes an unborn person. Defines unborn person to mean an unborn child from the time of fertilization of the ovum until live birth. Further provides that an unborn person has all of the same rights and protections afforded to any person under the California Constitution. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: The net fiscal impact of this measure on state and local expenditures and revenues is unknown.




Elections. Use of Internet for Voter Registration and Voting.
Initiative Statute, ID #870

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Marc Strassman

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 05/25/00)

Official Summary: Authorizes use of Internet for electronic voter registration and for casting ballots in direct primary elections, statewide general elections, special elections, and other public elections. Specifies standards for Internet voting systems. Requires Secretary of State to test and certify voting systems, to accredit means of identifying and authenticating voters, to protect voter confidentiality, and to adopt rules and regulations governing Internet voting procedures. Requires counties to offer Internet option to all voters. Criminalizes efforts to interfere with Internet election system; specifies penalties. Preserves traditional voting methods. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: One-time costs to local governments, probably several tens of millions of dollars statewide, for initial establishment of Internet registration and voting systems, with ongoing annual costs probably ranging from the millions of dollars to the low tens of millions of dollars statewide. One-time costs to State of developing standards for Internet voting and registration and of implementing other provisions, probably in the tens of millions of dollars, with ongoing implementation costs that could reach several million dollars annually. State costs could be partly offset to the extent that fees are charged to local governments or private vendors seeking accreditation of Internet election systems.




Restricting Application of Three Strikes Law to Violent and Serious Felonies.
Initiative Statute, ID #872

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Valerie L. Monroe
(310) 377-2735
and Jan B. Tucker
(818) 830-2794

available from proponent's web site

FOR

www.3strikesproject.com

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 05/26/00)

Official Summary: Amends "Three Strikes" law to require mandatory increased sentences only when current conviction is for serious or violent felony such as rape, robbery or burglary. Provides that only prior convictions for serious or violent felonies will qualify for second and third "strike" sentence enhancements. Requires re-sentencing within 180 days of enactment for persons currently sentenced pursuant to "Three Strikes" law if offense for which they were sentenced or prior convictions used to increase their sentences do not qualify under this measure as serious or violent felonies. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Estimated short term state savings of as much as $250 million from reduced prison operations with long term prison operations savings of as much as $500 million. Additional one time savings of up to $1 billion could result from delayed construction of new prisons. Increased short term costs to counties of tens of millions of dollars primarily due to the re-sentencing provisions of this measure. In the long term, the measure could result in net savings to counties, on a statewide basis, of as much as $15 million annually.




Identity Verification.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment, ID #873

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Ron Prince
(714) 899-9631

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 05/26/00)

Official Summary: Amends Constitution to require Department of Justice to verify identity of applicants for driver's licenses or state or local public benefits; require providers of public benefits to verify lawfulness of applicant's presence in the United States; preclude state or local public benefits for any alien classified ineligible under federal law; require sponsors to reimburse state or local government for benefits paid to a sponsored alien; require schools to determine lawfulness of pupils' presence in the United States; require state and local agents and agencies to report suspected violations of immigration laws to federal authorities. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Increased costs to state and local governments (including schools) to verify citizenship or immigration status of students, parents, persons seeking health care and social services, and persons who are arrested. Annual costs could potentially be in the tens of millions of dollars to over $100 million. Potential savings to state and local governments (primarily counties), of over $100 million annually, due to reduced expenditures for certain public benefits.



Identity Theft. Disclosure of Personal Information About Victims.
Initiative Statute, ID #875

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Timothy Hoy
(310) 440-2811

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 05/26/00)

see note

Official Summary: Provides that anyone who discloses personal information about victims of identity theft is guilty of a crime. Organizations that disclose personal information to felons resulting in identity theft are liable for damages. Requires organizations with financial information to develop procedures to prevent such disclosure. Organizations that disclose personal information to parties for direct marketing are required to inform victims of their legal rights and source of information. Allows identity theft victims to request nondisclosure of personal information to parties engaging in direct marketing. Requires state agency to issue model guidelines. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Measure could result in increased administrative costs for state and local governments to comply with its provisions.

Note: Senate Bill 1365 (Murray) now contains some of the provisions of the measure.




Mandatory Defense of Initiatives. Public Funding for Attorney Fees.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment, ID #881

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Ron Prince
(714) 903-3771

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 6/19/00)

Official Summary: Amends Constitution to: Require Governor to direct Attorney General to defend, through the highest appellate court, any lawsuit challenging an initiative approved by the voters; require initiative proponent be a party to any legal challenge; require state to pay attorney's fees and legal costs incurred by proponent as a party to any challenge; require party that loses a legal challenge to an approved initiative to pay reasonable legal costs and attorney's fees; defines proponent, and gives proponent of initiatives the right to sue government to enforce the initiative. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This measure would result in potential unknown state costs. The magnitude of these costs are probably not significant in the context of overall state expenditures.




Prayer in Public Schools
Initiative Constitutional Amendment, ID #882

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Carl Towe
(209) 556-0522

and Benjamin Lopez
(909) 626-8969

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 6/19/00)

Official Summary: Amends Constitution to require at least one minute of silence, at the beginning of school day, during which kindergarten through 12th grade students can choose to openly pray or not pray. Prohibits discrimination against students who exercise religious freedom in public schools. Provides that the Bible is a recognized source of history and students may base reports on it. Mandates daily opportunity for students to recite Pledge of Allegiance and requires retention of the word "God" in the pledge. Requires publication of measure's provisions in student handbooks. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This measure would result in public schools incurring some minor, primarily one-time costs to make information available to the public. These costs probably could be absorbed within existing school budgets.




Public Schools. Class Size Reduction. One-half Percent Sales Tax.
Initiative Statute, ID #883

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Senator Jack T. O'Connell
c/o Remcho, Johansen & Purcel
(415) 398-6230

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 6/19/00)

see note

Official Summary: Provides funds to reduce public school class sizes to not more than 20 pupils in elementary grades 4, 5, and 6, and in specified core subjects, including English language arts, math, science, social science in grades 7 through 12. Finances class size reduction program by enacting additional one-half percent retail sales tax, phased in over three years. Requires annual audits and reports by school districts receiving funding. Establishes order in which class size reductions will be funded. Requires adoption of regulations governing applications for and use of funds. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: This measure would result in annual state revenues of approximately $2.3 billion by 2003-04 from an additional one-half percent sales tax, supporting class size reduction in grades 4 through 12. It would also result in state and local costs, potentially in excess of $2 billion spread over many years, to provide additional facilities for class size reduction.

Note: Proponent told CVF on May 10th that they are no longer pursuing qualification of this measure.




Legalized Gambling.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment, ID #884

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Robert W. Wilson
(805) 983-2238

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 6/26/00)

Official Summary: Legalizes Las Vegas and Atlantic City type gambling for a period of 28 years at two locations only, California City in Kern County and an Indian reservation to be selected by majority vote of all California tribes recognized by the federal government. Permits gambling presently prohibited including slot machines and various other banked games. Creates three-member state commission to supervise gaming activities, including the issuance of permits. Upon expiration of 28 years, Legislature may: further extend experimental program; extend legalized gambling to all counties and Indian tribes; or eliminate gambling in its entirety. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This initiative could result in annual revenues to the state and local governments: This initiative could result in annual revenues to the state and local governments potentially in the tens of millions of dollars from fees and taxes associated with Las Vegas- and Atlantic City-type operations and related economic activity.



Tobacco Litigation Settlement Funds.
Designating State and Local Use of Funds.

Initiative Statute, ID #885

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

James E. Randlett
(916) 446-1111

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 6/26/00)

see note

Official Summary: Establishes, effective 1/1/2001, California Tobacco Settlement Fund and city and county Tobacco Settlement Funds. Requires proceeds from national tobacco litigation settlement be paid to such Funds and restricts annual allocations by state to designated health care services, and by cities and counties to health care and human services. When state tax revenues are forecasted to be less than prior fiscal year, the Legislature, by two-thirds vote, may reallocate state settlement proceeds. Allocation restrictions shall not apply to a county with population less than 750,000. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Measure would result in a state General Fund revenue loss, and a corresponding state special fund revenue gain, ranging from about $390 million to about $470 million annually (plus inflation adjustments). Similarly, there would be a commensurate revenue transfer from counties' current repositories for tobacco settlement payments to the local Tobacco Settlement Funds.

Note: Proponent told CVF on May 16th that they are no longer pursuing qualification of this measure.



California Tobacco Litigation Settlement Funds.
Allocating State Use to Designated Health Programs.

Initiative Statute, ID #886

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

James E. Randlett
(916) 446-1111

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 6/26/00)

see note

Official Summary: Establishes California Tobacco Settlement Fund effective 1/1/2001. Requires state monies received from the 1998 national tobacco litigation settlement be paid into Fund and restricts annual allocation of Fund to designated categories of health care services including: prescription drugs, community based long term care, emergency medical services, tobacco prevention, nonprofit clinics, school nurses services, trauma centers,
certain hospitals, poison control centers and other programs. Legislature, by two-thirds vote, may reallocate tobacco settlement proceeds when state tax revenues are forecasted to be less than the prior fiscal year. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Measure would result in a General Fund revenue loss, and a corresponding state special fund revenue gain, ranging from about $390 million to about $470 million annually (plus inflation adjustments).

Note: Proponent told CVF on May 16th that they are no longer pursuing qualification of this measure.



Prohibition on Unsolicited Telemarketing Calls and E-mail Advertisements.
Initiative Statute, ID #887

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Michael Johnson

mikemsj@earthlink.net

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

www.voterrevolt.org/
phone.html

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 6/26/00)

Official Summary: Makes it illegal to make any unsolicited telephone call to a residential telephone subscriber for the purpose of selling goods or services unless the seller has an ongoing business or personal relationship with the recipient, or the recipient has elected to receive such calls. Maks it illegal to send unsolicited e-mail advertisements to any electronic mail address in California unless the advertiser has an ongoing business or personal relationship with the recipient. Authorizes civil enforcement and recovery of civil damages by private parties. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: The measure would result in an unknown, but probably not significant, increase in annual state court costs and administrative expenses.



Legislators' and State Officers' Compensation.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment, ID #888

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Edward J. (Ted) Costa
(916) 482-6175

available from proponent's web site

FOR

www.peoplesadvocate.org

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 7/14/00)

Official Summary: Amends Constitution to: reduce salaries of legislators to $75,000 per year; requires Legislature's and voters' approval to adjust state officer salaries and benefits; reduces legislators' travel and living expenses to $75.00 per day, while in session, for up to 120 days annually; allows increases to expense payments if Legislature and voters approve; requires forfeiture of legislators' compensation if Budget Act not passed by June 15 of each year; requires compensation be forfeited until Budget Act is presented to the Governor; allows payment of forfeited compensation if Legislature and voters approve. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: This measure would result in reduced compensation costs for state officials of several million dollars annually, and unknown, but probably not significant, elections-related costs to the state and counties.



Reapportionment.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment, ID #889

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Edward J. (Ted) Costa
(916) 482-6175

available from proponent's web site

FOR

www.peoplesadvocate.org

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 7/14/00)

Official Summary: Requires the Judicial Council, each year following year of the national census, to appoint a 3-member panel of Special Masters to hold public hearings and prepare plans for the reapportionment of legislative, congressional, and Board of Equalization districts, in accordance with specified criteria. Requires California Supreme Court to review the reapportionment plans prepared by the Special Masters and determine
whether the plans comply with the California Constitution, and permits any elector to petition the Supreme Court to challenge reapportionment plans and propose an alternative plan. Adopted plans are subject to voter approval. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: This measure would result in elections-related costs to the state in the range of about $2 million and probably minor costs to counties.

News Article:

GOP ends effort to block redistricting,
San Diego Union Tribune, March 30, 2000




Referendum Process.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment, ID #890

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Sandi Webb

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 7/24/00)

Official Summary: Changes process for voter approval or rejection of new laws. Only entire law could be challenged. Request for petition form and $5,000 deposit would stay new law from taking effect. Reduces total signatures required to qualify petition for ballot from 5 to 2 percent of all votes cast for all candidates for Governor in preceding gubernatorial election. Extends petition deadline to 150 days after form issued. Requires petition printable from Internet and identifies Internet site for information. Removes requirement that petition include challenged law. Secretary of State to provide running count of signatures submitted. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This measure could result in significant costs for the state and for county governments on a statewide basis, potentially amounting to several million dollars per election.



Funding Private Investigation of Santa Barbara County Court Case Files of Insanity Actions.
Initiative Statute, ID #891

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Christopher A. Brown
(805) 967-4055

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

www.angelfire.com
/ca5/nojustice/

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 7/24/00)

Official Summary: Requires state to fund investigation of court files of insanity actions in Santa Barbara County. Funds to be available to voter approved investigator. Investigator is provided a superior court judge and courtroom equipped with video and sound recording equipment to take testimony on early court case files of insanity actions. Requires state to broadcast, on county government television, video documentation of investigation at minimum once each week for six months and, thereafter, once each month for ten years. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: The fiscal effect on the state and local governments of this measure is unknown.




Election District Reapportionment. Two-Thirds Vote.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment, ID #892

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Bill Jones

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 07/31/00)

see note

Official Summary: Requires two-thirds concurrence of both houses of Legislature to redraw district boundaries for Congress, State Assembly and Senate, Board of Equalization. Imposes deadline for passage of required redistricting plans following federal decennial census. Prohibits use of data regarding voters' party affiliations or voting history. Prohibits consideration of potential impact on incumbents or political parties. Links district boundaries: two Assembly districts comprise one Senate district; ten Senate districts comprise one Board of Equalization district. Requires single bill for all Senate, Assembly, Equalization district adjustments, and single bill for all adjustments to congressional districts. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This measure would probably have no fiscal effect on the state or local governments.

Note: Proponent told CVF on June 16th that they are no longer pursuing qualification of this measure.



Political Contribution Limits.
Initiative Statute, ID #893

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Bill Jones

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 07/31/00)

see note

Official Summary: Replaces current campaign finance laws. Limits campaign contributions by any person to: $25,000 annually to a political party or its committee; $10,000 with respect to an election, to a candidate for statewide office; and $5,000 with respect to an election, to a candidate for legislative office. Exempts sponsored committee formed to support or oppose ballot measures from contribution limits. Requires adjustment of contribution limits to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index beginning 2003 and odd numbered years thereafter. Requires candidates for statewide or legislative offices to report contributions of $5,000 or more online within 24 hours. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: The net fiscal effect of this measure is unknown at this time because it depends upon (1) whether the courts uphold Proposition 208 (approved by the voters in 1996) and allow it to go into effect before this measure goes before the voters and (2) whether the voters enact Proposition 25 on the March 2000 ballot.

Note: Proponent told CVF on June 16th that they are no longer pursuing qualification of this measure.



Election Districts. Redistricting Commission.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment, ID #894

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Bill Jones

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 07/31/00)

see note

Official Summary: Creates 17-member commission to redraw district boundaries for Congress, State Assembly and Senate, and Board of Equalization following decennial federal census. Sixteen Commission members appointed by legislative leadership, but current lobbyists and persons recently seeking or holding elective office are disqualified; Commission selects seventeenth member, who cannot be from a political party represented in Legislature. Prohibits consideration of or effect on incumbents or voters' political affiliations or voting history in making district adjustments. Requires geographically compact districts. Provides for Supreme Court review and permits voter referendum of redistricting plan. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Because the measure requires that the Legislature make funds available from its own budget for personnel and computer technology for the commission, and because the Legislature's budget is limited under the Constitution, the measure would probably not result in any additional costs related to these activities. However, to the extent that the commission incurs other costs, such as travel and expenses for members of the commission, the state could incur unknown, but probably not major, additional costs.

Note: Proponent told CVF on June 16th that they are no longer pursuing qualification of this measure.



Redistricting Commission. Election Districts.
Initiative Statute, ID #895

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Paul Rolf Jensen
(626) 396-8722

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 07/31/00)

Official Summary: Creates five-member commission to redraw district boundaries for Congress, State Assembly and Senate, Board of Equalization promptly after each federal census. Commission members appointed by Assembly Speaker, Senate Pro Tempore, leader of largest minority party in each house; four members select fifth member (Chair). Disqualifies current lobbyists and persons recently seeking or holding elective office. Prohibits district adjustments based on incumbents' residences or voters' political affiliations, race, ethnicity, national origin, unless required by federal law. Requires geographically compact districts. Permits Legislature to reject redistricting plans by three-fourths vote of both houses. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This measure would result in additional costs to the State for the commission to develop reapportionment plans every ten years. These costs are probably in the range of up to several million dollars, and would depend on a number of factors, including the costs to the commission to obtain and analyze data and compensate the members.



Elimination of Public Schools and Funding. Voucher System.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment, ID #896

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

John J. Hickey

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 8/7/00)

Official Summary: Amends Constitution to eliminate public education for grades K-12. Prohibits State from operating or regulating K-12 or technical schools and providing textbooks and other instructional materials. Establishes Educational Performance Fund to provide redeemable vouchers for K-12 educational expenses. Eliminates public educational funding after 20 years. Requires testing of students to determine performance levels. Requires Legislature to encourage formation of open-enrollment schools and provide legislation for low cost teacher housing/training complexes. Automatically qualifies credentialed teachers as licensed child care providers who may receive assignments of vouchers. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Sales of public schools could generate one-time revenues potentially exceeding $100 billion. Measure could also result in annual long-term savings approaching $100 billion for elimination of public support of K-12 education; capital outlay savings to state and local governments of as much as $1 billion annually; and potential loss of federal funds in the billions of dollars annually.



September Primary and Campaign Finance Reform.
Initiative Statute, ID #897

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Thomas W. Hiltachk
(916) 442-7757

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 8/14/00)

Official Summary: Establishes the first Tuesday in September as a statewide, nonpresidential primary election date. Repeals most campaign finance laws. Limits contributions to statewide candidates to $10,000 per person, and state legislative candidates to $5,000 per person, in each general, primary or special election. Exempts committees of political parties from campaign contribution limits. Adjusts the maximum contribution limits biennially, beginning in the year 2003 to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index. Requires candidates to file an online report, within 24 hours of receipt, of every contribution of $5,000 or more. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This measure could have significant fiscal effect on state government. However, the net fiscal effect of this new initiative is unknown at this time because it depends upon (1) whether the courts uphold Proposition 208 and allow it to go into effect before this new initiative would go before the voters, (2) whether the voters enact Proposition 25 on the March 2000 ballot, and (3) whether the provisions in this measure pertaining to primary election dates are interpreted to change the date such elections are held.



June Primary and Campaign Finance Reform.
Initiative Statute, ID #898

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Thomas W. Hiltachk
(916) 442-7757

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 8/14/00)

Official Summary: Establishes the first Tuesday in June as a statewide, nonpresidential primary election date. Repeals most campaign finance laws. Limits contributions to statewide candidates to $10,000 per person, and state legislative candidates to $5,000 per person, in each general, primary or special election. Exempts committees of political parties from campaign contribution limits. Adjusts the maximum contribution limits biennially, beginning in the year 2003, to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index. Requires candidates to file an online report, within 24 hours of receipt, of every contribution of $5,000 or more. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This measure could have significant fiscal effects on state government. However, the net fiscal effect of this new initiative is unknown at this time because it depends upon (1) whether the courts uphold Proposition 208 and allow it to go into effect before this new initiative would go before the voters, (2) whether the voters enact Proposition 25 on the March 2000 ballot, and (3) whether the provisions in this measure pertaining to primary election dates are interpreted to change the date such elections are held.




Repeal of Proposition 209. Public Employment, Education and Contracting.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment, ID #899

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Ron Ramirez

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 8/21/00)

Official Summary: Repeals article I, section 31, of the California Constitution which was added by the passage of Proposition 209 at the November 1996 general election. Article I, section 31, generally prohibits state and local governmental agencies and public schools, colleges, and universities from discriminating against, or granting preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This initiative could result in state and local government costs, depending on future action by the state and local governments to either restructure existing programs or expand or add new preference-based affirmative action programs.




Legislative Term Limits
Initiative Constitutional Amendment, ID #900

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

William P. Campbell
c/o Remcho, Johansen & Purcell
(415) 398-6230

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 8/28/00)

Official Summary: Amends the California Constitution to extend the limit on years of service for State Senators from two four-year terms to no more than twelve years, and the limit for Assembly members from three two-year terms to no more than twelve years. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: This measure would probably have no direct fiscal impact on the state or local governments.




Judges. Restrictions on Judicial Immunity.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment, ID #902

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Ronald Branson, Alex A. Burrola, David Silva, Kyle Hammans, Michael L. Pendleton, Gladys O. Miller, Patricia J. Barry, Wayne W. Miller, Summer Reese, Philip A. Putman, S. Denise Gonzalez, Peymon Mottahedeh, Stephen Pflanze

Not available online; contact Secretary of State's Elections Division to request hard copy:
(916) 657-2166

FOR

None

AGAINST

None

Failed qualification

(deadline 9/11/00)

Official Summary: Supersedes existing judicial immunity and creates three 25-member "Special Grand Juries" empowered to: determine if a judge may invoke judicial immunity in a civil suit; indict and, through a special trial jury, convict and sentence a judge for criminal conduct; and permanently remove a judge who receives three adverse immunity decisions or three criminal convictions. Disallows immunity for deliberate violations of law, fraud, conspiracy, intentional due process violations, deliberate disregard of material facts, judicial acts outside the court's jurisdiction, unreasonable delay of a case, or any deliberate constitutional violation. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: If passed, the measure will result in costs to the state of about $18 million annually for the operation of special grand juries. These costs could be partially to fully offset by a number of sources specified in the measure. To the extent that the measure results in additional civil cases being filed against judges in court, the measure could also result in unknown additional costs to the state for support of the courts.




Local Property Tax. Revenue Allocation. Local Government Control.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment, ID #903

PROPONENT

TEXT

WEB SITES

STATUS

Bill Graber
(909) 982-1996

and Glenn A. Bozar
(909) 949-8391

Text available online (in PDF) from the Attorney General's web site.

FOR

None as of December, 2000

AGAINST

None as of December, 2000

Failed qualification

(deadline 11/27/00)

Official Summary: Requires Legislature to return control of local property taxes to local government and revise tax allocation system within three years to meet this requirement. Establishes fixed apportionment of local property tax revenues: 50% to cities and counties for municipal services; 50% to finance county's public schools. Permits cities and counties to allocate portions of their share to special districts. Prohibits further collection of property tax revenues for Educational Revenue Augmentation Funds (ERAF). Legislature remains obligated to meet its school funding obligations, but not from local revenue sources. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Increased state costs for education of about $400 million annually. Unknown, but likely significant, shifts in revenues among cities, counties, and special districts.

Note: Proponent told CVF on November 29th that they did not gather enough signatures to qualify this measure.





Back to Initiative Watch Home Page



Main Page

What's New

CVF-NEWS

Links

Search

Contact Us

Support CVF

This page was first published on May 11, 2000 | Last updated on January 24, 2001
copyright 1994 - 2001, California Voter Foundation. All rights reserved.